newberktown: (Default)
Hiccup Haddock ([personal profile] newberktown) wrote2011-12-05 11:34 am
Entry tags:

IC Contact | Battle Post.



"Er... Hi, you've reached Hiccup Haddock. Or not, I guess. Leave a message and I'll get back to you when I can? I think I d--"

[Feel free to have pokemon battles with Hiccup played out here, too!]
doitrockapella: (ATTITUDE ❖ i'm the motherflippin')

audio; | cianwood city | october 21

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2012-10-30 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Or easier to concentrate on, like you suggested. Most fluent speakers don't tend to think very deliberately about the words they're choosing; maybe a beginning student of a language would actually stand a better chance of maintaining it here, if only because he or she would have to think more about it as it was said.

[Eee, Da Vinci.]

Ah, his mirror writing. Simple, yet surprisingly effective. Though some think he wrote that way out of simple practicality because he was left-handed, and so writing right to left kept the ink from smearing.
doitrockapella: (CONFIDENT ❖ why yes i speak jive)

audio; | cianwood city | october 21

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2012-10-30 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
Mirror writing was Da Vinci's "code" of choice. The words were written backwards, so they could only be read when reflected in a mirror.

[The more you know.]

Did he? Pigpen is what's called a "cypher". Codes traditionally involve the exchange of one word or concept for another — for example, you and I might decide to have a secret code in which we always refer to Albert as "duck". A cypher, on the other hand, is an alphabetical substitution, like Pigpen — each symbol represents one letter. And they both have their uses; the benefit of a cypher is that you can spell any word in the world, whether you have a pre-agreed "code word" for it or not. But the downside is that substitution cyphers are much easier to break.
doitrockapella: (BOW ❖ holy shit was that an honorific)

audio; | cianwood city | october 21

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2012-10-30 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
Why not? It's as good a word as any, and if you make it a word that's naturally associated with him in some way, it makes the code easier to break. If you and Astrid set up a code that always identified me as "Red", it'd be much less secure than if you decided to dub me "Footstool".

[Not that she particularly wants to be dubbed "Footstool", mind, but hey. An example's an example.]

And it doesn't matter what's in the notes. What matters is they're yours. Which means you also have a right to have people not read them.
doitrockapella: (EXPLAIN ❖ istanbul not constantinople)

audio; | cianwood city | october 21

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2012-11-01 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
[Her encyclopedic vocabulary, of course.]

Where we're from, innovation is valuable. People who come up with new ideas and technology have the right to sell it and profit off their creativity. So there's a certain personal interest in keeping some things secret — so someone else doesn't take what's yours and profit off it in your place.

But that's a perception that comes with our experiences. My guess is, yours has been different.
doitrockapella: (ATTITUDE ❖ i'm the motherflippin')

audio; | cianwood city | october 21

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2012-11-01 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd imagine it's probably not that likely here, either — there isn't that same sort of intellectual marketplace of ideas that he and I are used to. So if you choose not to write your secrets in code, simply not sharing your notes will probably suffice to keep them safe.